Real Energy Problems. Clear Decisions.
Navigating Growth from the Grid Up.
Our work is confidential by design. We present the problems, analytical methods, and decisions enabled — protecting client commercial and operating details.
Every engagement starts with the same question: Can the infrastructure actually carry this load?
Below is a record of where we have answered that question — for fleets, for transit agencies, for development banks, and for the operators building the next generation of charging networks.
Fleet & Electromobility
Public transit, last-mile logistics, and intercity corridors. Each project required energy modeling, technology benchmarking, and infrastructure sizing before a single piece of equipment was specified.
How we designed an electroterminal and model energy demand for electrifying city transit routes
The problem
The operator needed a technically grounded roadmap to electrify their core transit routes. The challenge was not simply whether to transition to electric mobility, but how to accurately size the supporting infrastructure, select the optimal technology, and estimate terminal costs before making significant capital commitments.
Key challenges
- Infrastructure Right-Sizing: Calculating precise energy demands and power capacities for high-frequency trunk corridors to prevent over-provisioning hardware.
- Technology Matching: Evaluating and selecting vehicle and charging technologies tailored to specific corridor profiles and operational demands.
- Financial Risk Mitigation: Modeling detailed CapEx and OpEx for terminal infrastructure to validate cost reasonableness prior to capital deployment.
scope
- Benchmarking of electric bus and charger technologies available in the market
- Energy modeling and route-level demand simulation in simulation software
- Conceptual design of the charging electroterminal
- Preliminary capital cost estimation
outcome
Actionable electroterminal design and validated energy model delivered as the basis for route-level investment decisions.
How we created a corridor-level electrification plan that accounts for specific climate and operational challenges
The problem
A transit authority needed to convert key urban corridors to a fully electric bus fleet under harsh coastal conditions. The challenge was adapting complex fleet electrification models to a tropical climate with high HVAC energy demands, specialized fleet requirements, and localized power grid limitations.
Key challenges
- Climate Resiliency: Factored extreme heat conditions into energy consumption and battery management models.
- Infrastructure Compatibility: Aligned high-power charging requirements with coastal grid capacity.
- Operational Strategy: Tailored route planning and charging cycles to a multi-spec fleet profile.
scope
- Benchmarking of electric bus and charger technologies
- Energy modeling and corridor-level simulation
- Conceptual charging terminal design
- Preliminary cost estimation across corridors
outcome
Full corridor-level electrification plan with technology selection framework and capital cost structure delivered to the state mobility authority.
How we provided technical leadership and ensure cost reasonableness for city-scale electromobility projects
The problem
A major multilaterally funded electromobility initiative required independent technical validation to evaluate the engineering integrity and budget reasonableness of a central charging depot. What began as a targeted due diligence review evolved into a comprehensive, full-lifecycle technical leadership mandate to safeguard project execution, ensure cost efficiency, and guarantee operational readiness across the entire program.
Key challenges
- Due Diligence & Integrity Auditing: Evaluating engineering designs and budget allocations to ensure technical viability and compliance with international lender standards.
- Depot Infrastructure Validation: Assessing power requirements, layout efficiency, and equipment specs for a major charging hub.
- Lifecycle Technical Leadership: Seamlessly transitioning from an initial audit role into providing continuous, end-to-end technical oversight across all project phases.
scope
- Verification of charging depot budget completeness and cost reasonableness
- Technical recommendations for the charging depot infrastructure
- Technical leadership in prequalification specifications
- Support in tender processes and supplier negotiation
- Construction supervision and commissioning oversight
outcome
Charging depot validated for due diligence. Technical mandate extended through procurement, construction, and commissioning phases of a city-scale electromobility program.
Charging strategy & Operations
Infrastructure is only as good as the strategy behind it. These engagements shaped how operators, fuel retailers, and fleet developers approach the commercial and technical architecture of charging networks.
How we developed a strategic commercial architecture and go-to-market plan for electric fleet expansion
The problem
An electric vehicle charging operator needed a ground-up strategic architecture to launch and scale its dedicated commercial fleet business unit. The objective was to build an end-to-end framework—from market segmentation to full Go-to-Market (GTM) execution—by translating complex geospatial and energy demand data into a commercially viable structure built to withstand real-world fleet operations.
Key challenges
- Ground-Up Strategic Design: Building an entire fleet vertical from scratch, establishing target market segments, value propositions, and commercial frameworks tailored to fleet operators.
- Geospatial & Demand Data Integration: Converting complex geospatial patterns and charging demand metrics into actionable site selection, capacity planning, and pricing strategies.
- Operational Resilience: Designing commercial frameworks and service models robust enough to accommodate real-world fleet duty cycles, strict uptime requirements, and daily operational constraints.
scope
- Segmentation of industries, vehicle typologies, and fleet mission profiles
- Commercial strategy by segment and channel
- Geospatial analysis and network growth strategy
- Strategic alliance identification
- Go-to-Market strategy development and rollout framework
outcome
Full vertical strategy delivered — from market segmentation through GTM playbook — providing the commercial foundation for fleet charging expansion.
How we train fuel retail operators on the technical and commercial fundamentals of transitioning to multimodal EV charging sites
The problem
A major fuel retail network required a structured capability-building program to prepare its retail station operators for the transition to multimodal service hubs featuring EV charging infrastructure. The primary objective was to design a comprehensive curriculum—bridging technical fundamentals and business model viability—specifically tailored for workforce members transitioning from traditional petroleum-handling backgrounds.
Key challenges
- Workforce Adaptation: Upskilling traditional fuel operators who lacked technical backgrounds in electrical engineering, high-voltage systems, and EV charging dynamics.
- Full-Spectrum Curriculum Design: Developing an end-to-end training framework covering everything from technical hardware fundamentals and grid safety to financial viability and customer service models.
- Business Model Transformation: Guiding legacy retail staff to successfully integrate EV charging operations, downtime management, and new revenue streams alongside traditional fuel retail operations.
Program modules
- Introduction to electric mobility and multimodal service station design
- Regulatory framework and applicable norms for charging stations
- Design, planning, and operation of charging infrastructure
- Business models, financing structures, and profitability strategies
- Emerging technologies, digitalization, and user experience
- Case studies and best practices
outcome
Ongoing program equipping fuel retail operators with the technical and commercial foundations to evaluate and deploy EV charging infrastructure at their sites.
How we structure a market entry and product strategy for commercial electric vehicle businesses
The problem
An electric vehicle manufacturer and technology provider required ongoing strategic advisory to capture growth opportunities across the commercial EV landscape. The objective was to build a comprehensive commercial engine by converting complex market dynamics into actionable strategy—ranging from sizing addressable demand and building multi-vehicle Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) models to structuring integrated Go-to-Market (GTM) strategies for both electric vehicles and charging infrastructure.
Key challenges
- Addressable Market Sizing: Quantifying total addressable demand and segmenting opportunities across diverse commercial vehicle classes and duty cycles.
- Multi-Category TCO Modeling: Developing robust Total Cost of Ownership frameworks comparing electric versus conventional fleets, factoring in energy tariffs, battery degradation, maintenance schedules, and upfront capital costs.
- Integrated GTM & Product Strategy: Structuring a unified commercial offer and product roadmap that seamlessly aligns vehicle hardware with charging infrastructure solutions for fleet clients.
scope
- Market analysis for electric vehicles and commercial retrofit
- Go-to-Market strategy design for electric fleets and charging solutions
- Operational requirements analysis and total cost of ownership (TCO) modeling for electric fleets
- Product strategy across commercial vehicles, electrified refrigeration, and battery and energy lab services
outcome
Sustained strategic advisory relationship spanning market sizing, go-to-market design, and product positioning across core EV business lines.
Research & Policy
Infrastructure decisions are shaped by the frameworks that precede them. These engagements produced the analytical foundations that cities and institutions use to evaluate charging deployment at scale.
How we created a transferable framework for public EV charging business models across diverse urban archetypes
The problem
An international urban climate initiative required a comprehensive benchmarking study to map and evaluate business models for public EV charging infrastructure across multiple global cities and distinct urban archetypes. The objective was to synthesize complex regulatory environments, diverse utility structures, and localized demand profiles into actionable, adaptable frameworks that municipal governments and private operators could use to guide their deployment decisions.
Key challenges
- Regulatory & Market Synthesis: Analyzing and comparing highly disparate regulatory frameworks, utility market structures, and grid integration policies across distinct international jurisdictions.
- Archetype Modeling: Categorizing diverse urban density patterns, traffic behaviors, and charging demand profiles into scalable business model templates.
- Public-Private Stakeholder Alignment: Translating complex policy, financial, and operational data into practical decision-making tools that address the distinct goals of both public sector planners and private infrastructure investors.
scope
- Definition of seven city archetypes and their infrastructure contexts
- Development of business models for public charging deployment by archetype
- Analysis of financing structures, cost recovery mechanisms, and regulatory enablers
- Synthesis into a transferable framework for city-level decision-making
outcome
Published report providing a comparative business model framework for public EV charging infrastructure across seven global city contexts.
One Methodology. Three Complex Systems.
Whether evaluating electric fleets, cold chain logistics, or high-load digital infrastructure, EVRY applies a consistent analytical engine to translate complex operational data into confident investment decisions.
01 — Analyse
Evaluate real operational data, duty cycles, climate variables, and physical grid constraints.
02 — Model
Simulate load behavior, site-level interactions, thermal requirements, and power profiles.
03 — Optimise
Identify optimal combinations of operating formats, site assignments, and energy assets.
04 — Plan
Deliver investment-ready specifications, sequencing roadmaps, and execution criteria.
